Digital assets, cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, tokenized instruments, and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), are moving from fintech hype to serious boardroom discussions. For treasurers tasked with safeguarding liquidity and risk, the question is no longer if they should engage, but how.
1.What Digital Assets Mean for Treasury
At Prodktr, we see stablecoins as the first practical entry point for MDBs and sovereign treasurers, offering speed, FX efficiency, and tighter control compared to traditional rails.
- Tokenized assets (T-bills and MMFs) will likely sit as liquidity side-pockets before they ever replace core portfolios.
- CBDC pilots matter strategically but will remain mostly observatory until reporting and policy standards mature.
Market Signals:
- Deloitte’s 2025 CFO survey: 23% of CFOs expect their treasury to engage with crypto by 2027 (39% at $10B+ firms). Nearly all foresee stable-coin use.
- Yet, the UK Association of Corporate Treasurers stresses most boards still see digital assets as speculative and misaligned with treasury’s conservative mandate.

Crypto is gaining currency with North American CFOs (Deloitte: https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/business-strategy-growth/2q-2025-cfo-signals-survey.html)
This gap between perception and practicality is where treasuries must focus, bridging innovation with upgraded policies, controls, and reporting to strengthen resilience rather than undermine it.
2. Where They Fit in the Operating Model
Success depends less on technology adoption and more on operating model redesign. Policies, controls, and reporting frameworks must be upgraded first, ensuring innovation doesn’t compromise compliance or resilience.

Core treasury functions affected by digital assets
Adoption means upgrading custody models, policies, and system integrations, not simply adding another asset class
3. Adoption in Core Treasury Functions
- Cross-border payments: 55% of corporates using stable coins cite this as their top case. Some expect 5–10% of flows to run on stablecoins by 2030. (Pilots: SpaceX, Standard Chartered).
- Reserves diversification: Tokenized MMFs surpassed $1B AUM in 2024. They offer yield + liquidity with less volatility than crypto. (MicroStrategy’s $6.8B Bitcoin position shows another angle).
- Capital markets: Siemens issued a €60M blockchain bond (2023). The EIB piloted a €100M digital bond with CBDC settlement (2021).

Chart 2: Emerging Digital Asset Use Cases
4. Risks and Challenges
The obstacle isn’t volatility; it’s the operating model. Too often, pilots stall in “proof of concept” because governance, infrastructure, and visibility aren’t ready for parallel fiat + token flows.
Key risk categories:
- Integration into existing operating model and technology with data.
- Alignment of new capabilities with legacy data and system
- Visibility & reporting: No real-time, auditable view across fiat and token balances. Templates are needed.
- Custody & cyber: Weak key management and custodial reliance. Global best practices are still evolving.
- Regulatory divergence: MiCA (EU), UK frameworks, US GAAP, IFRS all diverge. Alignment is crucial.
- Accounting & compliance: IFRS impairment asymmetry + AML/KYC burden. Systems are not designed to automate at scale.
5. Best Practices
Adoption works best through a phased approach:
- Start with controlled pilots: closed loop use cases (e.g., intercompany stablecoin transfers).
- Redesign policies upfront: explicitly covering wallets, custody, accounting, and settlement cycles.
- Strengthen reconciliation: dual-track for fiat + on-chain activity, with exception logging and stress tests.
- Test custody resilience: layered custody (MPC, multi-sign, hot/cold tiers) plus incident simulations.
- Integrate step by step: connect balances/flows into TMS, ERP, risk systems incrementally.
- Scale with assurance: broader payments and investments only once governance + reconciliations are proven.
How Prodktr Ensures Efficient, Compliant Integration
Prodktr begins with operating model review and target operating model design, strengthening controls, governance, and end-to-end workflows before technology rollout. Our framework connects treasury, risk, and operations through structured processes, and integrated reporting, balancing visibility with assurance.
Capital markets:
AIIB’s 2024 digitally native note on Euroclear’s D-FMI platform reflects how regulated institutions are exploring digital issuance within trusted frameworks, strengthening efficiency and transparency without disrupting existing controls. Siemens’ €60M digital bond (2023) and the EIB’s €100M CBDC-settled bond (2021) illustrate the same gradual shift, from experimentation toward practical integration in established capital markets.
5. Looking Ahead
Digital assets will reshape liquidity and payments. But adoption must follow a model-first, phased approach.
For treasurers, the real goal isn’t to tick the “innovation” box through pilots, it’s to build operating models that are resilient, compliant, auditable, and capable of managing fiat and tokenized flows side by side.
That is the path to lasting modernization.
Contact us for more information.
—-
References
- References
- Deloitte CFO Signals Q2 2025: Digital Currency Adoption in Treasury
- Euro Finance: Cryptocurrency Gains Traction in Corporate Boardrooms
- EY-Parthenon: Global Stablecoins Survey 2025
- McKinsey: Stablecoins and Tokenized Cash
- European Investment Bank (EIB): First Digital Bond on Blockchain
- Siemens: Siemens Issues Digital Bond on Blockchain
- AIIB (2024). AIIB issues its first digitally native note on Euroclear’s D-FMI platform

